Planning tool

Data Annotation Vendor Scorecard

Score a vendor from 1 to 5 on nine suggested criteria. Weights sum to 100 percent and are labeled as a framework, not a standard.

Request Expert Capacity Request Expert Capacity

Methodology

Weighted score = Σ (criterion score × weight). Scores are 1–5; weights are the published suggestions.

Domain expertise (25%)Can the vendor staff the exact profession, specialty, and seniority in the brief?Score 3 / 5Qualification process (15%)Do tests resemble production artifacts, with a written pass bar?Score 3 / 5Quality assurance (15%)Are calibration, gold sets, and sampling defined before volume starts?Score 3 / 5Adjudication (10%)Who resolves disagreement, and are they more senior or more specialized?Score 3 / 5Security (10%)Can reviewers work in the client environment with project-scoped access?Score 3 / 5Capacity (10%)Are hours from qualified people, not a contractual adjective?Score 3 / 5Workforce continuity (5%)What happens when an expert drops in week two?Score 3 / 5Reporting (5%)Can you see throughput, vacancy, agreement, and escalations?Score 3 / 5Commercial terms (5%)Are production, review, adjudication, and management priced transparently?Score 3 / 5Weighted score: 3.00 / 5. Suggested weights only; change them internally if your risk profile differs.

Limitations

Your legal, security, or domain risk may justify different weights. A high score is not a substitute for a paid pilot.

What kind of experts do you need?

Share the profession, specialty, experience, location, headcount, hours, duration, and project description. We assemble the expert capacity.

Request Expert Capacity

Need 25 licensed nurses for a clinical AI evaluation
Need 15 attorneys in a specific practice area
Need 20 PhD scientists for benchmark creation
Need 30 senior software engineers for code evaluation